MY TAKE By Mohammed Adamu
E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it GSM: 08035892325
As a body corporate, fully conscious of the constitutional right of contest of her members, the PDP, in 1999, met and consensually voted to enshrine in her Constitution, a Presidential power-sharing arrangement which precludes members from exercising that right outside a mutually beneficial geo-political quid pro quo between the North and the South.
Read More
Add Comment (0)
Hits: 33
In part one of this title two weeks ago, I had wondered why lawyers who were rationally disposed to the PDP zoning arrangement would not do us the patriotic duty to avail themselves of the judicial process, in order to nail the coffin, legally speaking, of Jonathan’s divisive candidacy.
The legalistic arrogance oozing from the car-stickers warning: “don’t mess with lawyers!” usually disgust me! Because I wonder: ‘should lawyers then mess’ with laymen!? I don’t think so.
Whenever the Ghalli NASS -(and by the way there is nothing personal against the former Speaker, other than his name aptly personifies his legislative era)-; whenever that Assembly spoke about checks and balances it erroneously or even mischievously sold the idea that primarily the checking was an exclusive preserve of the legislature.
